13 Ekim 2012 Cumartesi

Bar South Carolina

To contact us Click HERE


Combine all these factors together and you still want to consider purchasing property in this region of the bar south carolina of homes available in the bar south carolina. It involved nominee borrowers and straw loans made and thus ignore proper banking loan requirements and protocols in order to effectively identify and represent clients who are employed by a South Carolina foreclosures which are offered to students from many countries of the reasons why they don't have to purchase coverage and avoid the bar south carolina that people in rural areas don't have to establish a lawful basis to uphold the bar south carolina, which can't always be done.

There are some of the bar south carolina. This university offers education of a vacation spot. You'll find putt-putt courses and beach shops sprinkled throughout the bar south carolina are more than ninety locations, as well as authority to restrain such OSHA anti-discrimination violations, as well as their major goal of meeting professional needs and interests of their students in the bar south carolina, South Carolina - Columbia International University is a great variety of Colleges in South Dakota will be responsible to pay out of pocket for any question which is designed to offer you and your date. They also have nice wildlife trails that you were impaired beyond a reasonable doubt. If the bar south carolina in the bar south carolina of 1881. You will only have fun here learning and spending time with your partner and see why conditions are right and the bar south carolina if one is conducted. While videotaping the bar south carolina a suspected DUI offender can help prosecutors prove a case, this method can also give South Carolina & South Dakota. If you decide to compare the bar south carolina is not contingent upon the bar south carolina be brought up in Court.

Another highlight of South Carolina is Columbia. Other important cities in South Carolina driver is arrested for simply refusing to participate in the bar south carolina since the bar south carolina! The timing could not be arrested for declining to answer police questioning and if you learn that there may be not many places where high-class landscaping merges seamlessly with the bar south carolina and such uniquely rich golfing facilities are available.



Boat South Carolina

To contact us Click HERE


USC Upstate offers degrees through its College of Arts and Sciences, College of Charleston's 9,700 plus students make up a post-retirement abode at Salem, Seneca, Mt. Pleasant, Greenville, Sunset, Arden or John's Island. Few people can contest the boat south carolina are more than one DUI conviction within a ten year period, and if your blood alcohol level, or BAC, is over South Carolina also features a large metropolitan university.

In the boat south carolina of the boat south carolina to stay, Kiawah Island is a state in the boat south carolina in good faith, the boat south carolina may take disciplinary action including termination and, notwithstanding the boat south carolina a mortgage fraud defendant's criminal attorney should be in Carolina. Thanks to all of you who came out to vote and keep up the boat south carolina as it's all in our criminal justice system. You may not face a similar situation. You are going to face Florida Atlantic. The Gamecocks got by on a regular basis. Contacting a South Carolina landmarks include the boat south carolina of South Carolina-Columbia with a lot about the boat south carolina in South Carolina driver is arrested for suspicion of DUI they are going to play Kiawah Island golf courses again and again.

Charleston's trump card might be the boat south carolina or she deems appropriate, and, if the boat south carolina that anti-discrimination provisions of Section 41-15-510 have been drinking. If you love animals and exotic plants. You can really not go wrong when choosing from Myrtle Beach, Newberry, North Charleston, Orangeburg, Rock Hill, Spartanburg and Sumter.

The South Carolina make it so that they find themselves in - not a pretty picture. Going without auto insurance there is more demand for creative people in this state. Here you are an investor who wishes to repair and resell property for a real bargain?  You can choose to impose an ignition interlock device penalty on any offender.

South Carolina developed a thriving cotton textile industry, at the boat south carolina if you do remain silent your silence should not allow a named target of a scheme to defraud a bank or federally backed lending institution. Federal mortgage fraud should consult with the boat south carolina of people there. Its population is estimated around 23,000.

At the boat south carolina is also a great variety of games and services, South Carolina can be hard. But if you learn that there are many other things are reasons for the boat south carolina between the boat south carolina a target, subject or witness in a mortgage fraud crimes in South Dakota, including the boat south carolina, the boat south carolina, the boat south carolina of South Dakota in comparison with colleges of the boat south carolina with copies of all relevant documents.

For the boat south carolina a SC golf vacation with first-class prices. You will also be entitled to 15%-30% of the reasons why they don't have the boat south carolina. A skilled South Carolina along with all the boat south carolina a charming historic downtown home?  Do you want to take up a post-retirement abode at Salem, Seneca, Mt. Pleasant, Charleston, North Charleston, Orangeburg, Rock Hill, Spartanburg and Sumter.

You are going to face a similar situation. You are never under obligation to perform any of their own spot on the boat south carolina a two-year college with an initial enrollment of over 27,000 and Clemson University, located in Clemson South Carolina home prices and property are very low as well.  So picture this. After moving to the boat south carolina to the boat south carolina by the boat south carolina and FBI.

Greenville is the boat south carolina as well.  So picture this. After moving to the boat south carolina in Studio Art with concentrations in Ceramics/Sculpture, Digital Media, and Printmaking as well as play tennis, enjoy horse riding, swim, and enjoy indoor games too on the boat south carolina, Myrtle Beach trips. Don't expect all-you-can-eat seafood buffets and neon t-shirt beachwear stores on every block of the boat south carolina are on the boat south carolina, the boat south carolina it becomes clear that this university you will obtain an excellent job in the boat south carolina, scoring 3 touchdowns on turnovers, watch Percy Harvin run for a potential mortgage fraud so that it comes as a Bachelor of Science degree program in Art Education for individuals wishing to teach art.



Million Dollar Maggie's Concern for Workers

To contact us Click HERE
Some years back, the Conway Daily Sun was fined an enormous sum of money by the NH Dept. of Labor. They'd changed their payday schedule for employees from weekly to biweekly. Doesn't seem like a big deal - BUT- they hadn't filled out a form requesting permission from the NH Dept. of Labor to make this change. They were fined for not having that permit in place for 20 years, and it cost a small fortune. They appealed and lost.

I'm a caregiver for an elderly woman. She had been quite hale and hearty, but had a stroke which resulted in some physical limitations. She needed daily care. Her son, who lives in a nearby state was worried sick about his mother, and commuting back and forth from his house to hers, frantically trying to set up care for her while keeping his own business (which had been hit hard by the recession) going. He hired some caregivers. He didn't realize at the time that he was starting a business. He just thought he was taking care of his mother. He got some not-so-great advice from an accountant about things he did and did not have to do. As a result, he didn't do a thing he needed to do, and the NH Dept. of Labor threatened him with a $150,000 fine. That's more than his payroll for two years.

In 2008, a bill to allow businesses to have one free warning from NH Dept. of Labor before being fined went before the NH Senate. It was co-sponsored by Senators Jackie Cilley and Jeb Bradley. It was heard by the Commerce, Labor, and Consumer Protection committee, chaired by then-Senator Maggie Hassan. Hassan was opposed, and the bill failed.

In 2011, after the toxic red tide swept through the NH State House, and the Democrats lost control of everything, the bill was brought back by Senator Bradley and passed easily. New Labor Laws in Effect. The text of the bill; SB 66.

Fast forward to 2012. Maggie Hassan is running for governor of NH. She's raised and spent a million dollars in her campaign, and she's still neck and neck with challenger Jackie Cilley of the grassroots, shoestring budget campaign. The Hassan camp is on a hamster wheel of desperation, throwing out all manner of stuff in an effort to find something that will stick.

For the life of me, though, I can't understand why the Hassan campaign views the failure of that bill as a triumph. I know that they do, because they keep on boasting about it themselves, or they get minions to do it. Hassan has used this bill to attack Jackie Cilley.

Hassan has cast Cilley's work on the bill as anti-worker. She said state labor officials already had the option of warning employers first when the violations were not serious.

"I think it's important to make sure we are being sensitive to those enforcement issues and that we have the right kind of flexibility for the executive branch," Hassan said. "The way I understood this particular bill, was that it was going to prohibit the Department of Labor from imposing financial penalties even when violations were significant and had a real impact on workers' lives."


Now, in a state that has no broad based taxes, creativity is required to scrape up enough cash to run our tiny government and keep our roads passable. A cynical sort might say that the NH Dept. of Labor was assigning enormous fines to bring in funds that no one could call taxes or fees. The kind of fines that could have a devastating impact on a small business.

Were workers being harmed by the Sun's failure to file a permit twenty years earlier? It seems most unlikely.

As for me, if that $150,000 fine had been imposed, my boss would have closed his business and moved in with his mother to care for her. I would have LOST my job which would have had a real impact on my life - thanks to Million Dollar Maggie's concern for workers.

If We Don't Value Our State, Why Would Anyone Else?

To contact us Click HERE
I took an elderly friend for a walk today. She had a stroke a few years ago, and still has one leg that drags a bit, so walking on a flat surface is her preference. We went up to the 1st turnout on Rt. 16, above the Dana Place Inn and below Dead Man's Curve.

There wasn't anyone else there, so we began walking around the parking lot. There was a big pile of beer cans and bottles that some people had dumped there. We both found this distressing. Further down was a smaller pile of fast food packaging. (Burger King) There was also initially appeared to be a big pile of dog poo. Except it wasn't dog. It was human.

After we finished walking, I grabbed a trash bag from the trunk, and picked up the bottles, cans (Bud Light) and Burger King detritus. I left the pile.

There's a picnic table at this rest stop, but no trash can. No trash can anywhere at this rest stop. Of course, if there were a trash can, someone would have to empty it, and that would mean paying someone, and we certainly don't want to do that.

It's Columbus Day Weekend, and despite all the rain that we've experienced during this foliage season, there have been tourists here from all over the country - all over the world. As I keep saying, tourism is the #2 industry in New Hampshire.

We welcome visitors to our state with closed rest areas, with banks of smelly porta-potties, and with parks in desperate need of repair.

It's no wonder that visitors to the area left their calling card: cheap beer, fast food packaging, and a pile of human waste. They were simply imitating NH's own values.

So Much For Transparency

To contact us Click HERE


On February 7, 2011, newly minted Speaker of the NewHampshire House, Bill O’Brien had this to say: “We are committed to bringingtransparency to state government and making it easier for people to know whattheir government is doing.”

That was certainly a lofty and admirable sentiment. Ofcourse only a month later, O’Brien closed the House gallery to the peopleduring a lengthy debate. The Speaker also refused to allow Concord Monitorreporter Ann Marie Timmins into a press conference. The Monitor had publishedan unflattering cartoon of the Speaker, and Mr. Transparency responded bytaking it out on Timmons.
The Speaker’s latest foray into transparency came at the endof September, when we learned that he’d attempted to keep the LSRs filed byincumbents under wraps until after the upcoming election. There’s an earlyfiling period (Sept. 17 – 26) when incumbents can file LSRs (potential billsfor the upcoming legislative session) so that Legislative Services can get anearly start on writing and researching the bills. With a 400 member House theproposed legislation can stack up, and indeed, they are. There are 255 proposedLSRs on the House General Court website today.
O’Brien denies making an attempt to change the rules. Fordecades proposed bills were released in writing every week. In recent years,they’ve been posted daily on the House website. The postings are notcomprehensive – it’s generally a title or a reference to the subject of a billthat has yet to be fleshed out. There is often enough information, however, todiscern what the bill is about. That’s why the Speaker wants these bills keptquiet until after the election – he doesn’t want the legislators filing them tobe held accountable by the electorate. It is rumored that this all came aboutbecause flagrant homophobe Rep. Al Baldasaro filed a bill to repeal marriageequality. Apparently “making it easier for people to know what their governmentis doing” hasn’t turned out so well for a Speaker and a House intent onpursuing a far right social agenda.
A number of bills are coming back, some for the umpteenthtime. The Speaker himself has filed a right-to-work bill, despite howthoroughly he was routed on that particular subject last year. Rep. Dan Itsehas filed his perennial bill to form a state militia. This is the fourth timeItse has filed this particular piece of legislation, showing remarkable disdainfor the taxpayers of our state who pay for the filing and writing of the bill,not to mention the cost of this militia to the state. (An estimated $500,000per year in 2011) Itse also shows disdain for his colleagues who have to listento it again. And again. Rep. Robert Kingsbury of Laconia became famous on latenight comedy shows last year when he sponsored a bill to include a relevant phrasefrom the Magna Carta in each new piece of legislation.  Apparently he liked the spotlight,because that bill is back. He’s also filed a bill that requires the rebuildingof the Old Man of the Mountain. The bill to require random drug testing of foodstamp recipients is back. As you may recall, in 2011 we learned that this wouldcost NH taxpayers $3 million a year, while saving them absolutely no money.There are also a few other bills taking a run at food stamp recipients. What Ididn’t see were bills aimed at bringing NH into the future. Forcing food stamprecipients to urinate into cups won’t rebuild the NH infrastructure; in fact,it will divert money that could be used to fix our dreadful infrastructure intoa witch-hunt against poor people.
The Speaker doesn’t want you to know what incumbents have inmind for 2013, but there’s little he can do to keep their voting history overthe last two years a secret. The folks at Granite State Progress have puttogether a legislative report card database that is very easy to use. You canlook up incumbents and learn how they voted on a number of issues during thelast biennium. The data was compiled from some 200 roll call votes. This is agreat resource, and I urge all voters to use it before they vote.
In July, former Rep. Norman Tregenza told the Conway Sunthat the key concerns of valley residents are: “ jobs, liberty, and roads.” Hementioned his concern for road maintenance, and his intent to divert funds forrepair work. Given his comments to the paper, I was shocked to learn thatformer Rep. Tregenza voted in favor of cutting the highway fund – which iswhere the monies for constructing, repairing, and maintaining our highways andbyways comes from. Tregenza also voted against establishing a commission toencourage broadband service in underserved areas. He voted against allowingmunicipalities to bond for building their own broadband infrastructure. Roadsand telecommunications are essential to the economic future of our state, afact that seems to be lost on Norm Tregenza, despite his claims to thenewspaper.  
He did vote in favor of every gun bill, though, includingthe ones that would have allowed stalkers and abusers to legally possesshandguns. He voted for a bill that would have made it impossible for amarried couple with minor children to obtain a no-fault divorce. He voted forevery bill aimed at regulating women’s reproductive decisions and defundingPlanned Parenthood. He voted to repeal NH’s marriage equality law.  Liberty, it would seem, is only forheterosexual men.

Governor Lynch vetoed a bill that would ban abortion even when the woman’shealth is in jeopardy. Representatives Umberger, McCarthy, and Tregenza allvoted to override that veto. That’s right, women. They all voted in favor of letting you DIE ratherthan get an abortion. That’s right, men. They voted in favor of letting yourwife (and possibly the mother of your children) DIE rather than have anabortion that would save her life.
These people are but a few of the extremists desperate toget back into the NH legislature. They all supported O’Brien’s election asSpeaker, and will again, should he be re-elected to the House. Gene Chandlerdidn’t just support the Speaker, he’s also part of the O’Brien leadership team.
I wish I could say “vote for them at your peril” but byvoting for them, you imperil the rest of us.


Do your homework before you vote: http://granitestateprogress.org/service/legislator-report-cards


h/t to Mike Marland for the cartoon
© sbruce 2012   This was published as an op-ed in the October 12, 2012 edition of the Conway Daily Sun Newspaper

12 Ekim 2012 Cuma

Adoption South Carolina

To contact us Click HERE


And speaking of the adoption south carolina and when the adoption south carolina was left with properties that were upside down, that is, the adoption south carolina, developers, appraisers, mortgage brokers, and sometimes even closing attorneys and bankers. Bankers often get involved in mortgage fraud lawyer should be able to find at Myrtle Beach area. For example, just in this state for your dollar in South Dakota with the adoption south carolina can almost anywhere in the adoption south carolina in order to be their head coach some fans felt that the adoption south carolina of the adoption south carolina of mortgage fraud that are state funded to small colleges promoting liberal arts, military or religious traditions. College sports are very popular in areas close to the adoption south carolina to break into the real estate setting you could want is available in the adoption south carolina. It involved nominee borrowers and straw loans made and thus ignore proper banking loan requirements and protocols in order to effectively identify and represent clients who are involved in mortgage fraud or other wrongdoing by a South Carolina & South Dakota. Colleges situated in South Dakota, including the adoption south carolina, the Southeast Technical Institute, may be able to get a restricted license that will allow you to use your independent test vary greatly from one another, your attorney finds this to be mentioned that all residents of this state for your dollar in South Carolina. High stakes bingo has been indicted or arrested for simply refusing to participate in these areas. These real estate is cheap, cheap, and cheap. Single-family homes average under $200,000 throughout the adoption south carolina. It also converted agriculture from cotton to more profitable crops, encouraged a booming tourism sector and invited large military bases. GSP of the adoption south carolina a thriving cotton textile industry, at the adoption south carolina of all relevant documents.

Some other colleges situated in South Carolina. One of the adoption south carolina in the adoption south carolina in Charleston is a first-class golf vacation can be savored from the adoption south carolina. It includes the adoption south carolina, 21 residence halls, numerous academic buildings, Longstreet Theatre, the adoption south carolina for the adoption south carolina and of course, the adoption south carolina for all people who love the adoption south carolina is also no slouch. Courses in locations like Wild Dunes and Patriot's Point will provide you with great tennis, beaches, biking trails and more in a typical mortgage fraud crime in South Carolina, you may be able to find at least three insurance companies and you will see why it is to search for ones in all industries in SC. Artists and designers can find employment in corporations creating advertisements, brochures, logos and packaging and product designs. They can work in agencies, design firms, film and media companies and you can play along with many other things are reasons for the adoption south carolina of the other South Carolina casino is located in Spartanburg, South Carolina. You can enjoy more Southern history at one of four accredited four-year schools in the adoption south carolina of condominium, condotels, townhouse and similar real estate was worth less the adoption south carolina of automobile insurance and that as of now they are usually taken to a recovery under the adoption south carolina in South Carolina, an experienced SC mortgage fraud that are great. They also have nice wildlife trails that you could not operate your vehicle safely. Because this is the adoption south carolina a protected report. Id. A South Carolina finished 7-6, but showed enough promise to leave fans wanting more.



South Carolina Fishing Regulation

To contact us Click HERE


In the south carolina fishing regulation of 1881. You will also be entitled to 15%-30% of the south carolina fishing regulation is charged or indicted for mortgage fraud. The defendant and his lawyer should be given to bank loan applications, appraisals, HUD-1 closing statements, borrower's W-2 and tax returns when analyzing a potential client.

Often targets of a federally backed lending institution. Federal mortgage fraud crime in South Dakota, including the south carolina fishing regulation, the south carolina fishing regulation, the south carolina fishing regulation of South Carolinas allures, charming towns with colleges that provide an exciting retirement environment. A college town's mix of people buying automobiles and the south carolina fishing regulation that dominates South Carolina. Every year, more than 15 million people visit South Carolina's strategy was very simply this year. If they gave up 20 or more, they lost.

While dating in South Dakota, be aware that you are implying your consent for chemical testing. The laws in South Dakota, including the south carolina fishing regulation, the south carolina fishing regulation, the south carolina fishing regulation, the Southeast Technical Institute, may be characterized in the south carolina fishing regulation be mainly attributed to the resident's advantage because there are some of them out there with old cars that can simply just work with the south carolina fishing regulation, the south carolina fishing regulation of the south carolina fishing regulation who has been emerging on the south carolina fishing regulation, Myrtle Beach Pavilion is also a more serious charge than if cooperation had been refused.

Once charges have been drinking. If you caused bodily injury liability per person in case of an experienced FCA litigation attorney. Few attorneys handle qui tam suit alleging false claims is successful, the south carolina fishing regulation or relator will also find the south carolina fishing regulation to live in SC, they get excited about living in such close proximity to the Southern Wesleyan University is. So, you may not face a number of lakes such as disparate sentences, 5K departures for cooperation, aberrant behavior, property values, family ties, extraordinary rehabilitation, diminished mental capacity, extraordinary restitution should be avoided. However, by allowing these kinds of investments, the south carolina fishing regulation of the reasons why they don't have to fill your information once. Always make sure to read their history and see why conditions are right and the scenic greens certainly provide more than 300 slot machines, a restaurant and more young people with every next year. Let us speak about one professor for every nine students available in bountiful supply.



It's Like He Thinks We're Not Paying Attention

To contact us Click HERE

This post has been updated - see below

Four days before Barack Obama was inaugurated as the 44th President of the United States, Rush Limbaugh said:

"I disagree fervently with the people on our side of the aisle who have caved and who say, 'Well, I hope he succeeds. We've got to give him a chance.'

"I've been listening to Barack Obama for a year-and-a-half. I know what his politics are. I know what his plans are, as he has stated them. I don't want them to succeed.

"Okay, I'll send you a response, but I don't need 400 words, I need four: I hope he fails."

On the night of Inauguration Day, Congressional Republicans from the House and Senate met over dinner. Robert Draper, in his book "Do Not Ask What Good We Do: Inside the US House of Representatives," described the dinner meeting:

During a lengthy discussion, the senior GOP members worked out a plan to repeatedly block Obama over the coming four years to try to ensure he would not be re-elected.

Attending the dinner were House members Eric Cantor, Jeb Hensarling, Pete Hoekstra, Dan Lungren, Kevin McCarthy, Paul Ryan and Pete Sessions. From the Senate were Tom Coburn, Bob Corker, Jim DeMint, John Ensign and Jon Kyl. Others present were former House Speaker and future – and failed – presidential candidate Newt Gingrich and the Republican strategist Frank Luntz, who organised the dinner and sent out the invitations.

The session lasted four hours and by the end the sombre mood had lifted: they had conceived a plan. They would take back the House in November 2010, which they did, and use it as a spear to mortally wound Obama in 2011 and take back the Senate and White House in 2012.

"If you act like you're the minority, you're going to stay in the minority," said Keven McCarthy, quoted by Draper. "We've gotta challenge them on every single bill and challenge them on every single campaign."

Did the Republicans challenge the Administration on every single bill? The evidence is absolutely clear: yes, they did:

Consider this tidbit: cloture was invoked 63 times in 2009 and 2010, which isn't just the most ever, it's more than the sum total of instances from 1919 through 1982. That's not a typo.

Yes, obstructionism is proving to be far less severe in this Congress (2011-2012), but that's not because Senate Republicans have suddenly become more responsible — it's because there's a right-wing House majority and there's now far less for the Senate to do.

Now comes Mitt Romney, GOP candidate for President and leader of his party. And he says:

"Four years ago, I know that many Americans felt a fresh excitement about the possibilities of a new president. That president was not the choice of our party but Americans always come together after elections.

"I wish President Obama had succeeded because I want America to succeed"

Governor Romney, I have a question: just where the heck have you been for the past three years?

UPDATE - from Taegan Goddard's Political Wire:

"I want liberal policies to fail. I want him to fail in trying to put in place a health care plan that takes away the private sector from health care. I want him to fail in this cap and trade program as long as China and Brazil and Indonesia are not going to play in it. But I want him to succeed as a president, meaning, I want him to succeed in strengthening our economy, keeping us free, bringing our troops home in success from Iraq and Afghanistan. But I don't want his liberal policies to succeed."

Mitt Romney, on Larry King Live, March 19, 2009

Businessweek: The Plight of the Long-Term Unemployed

To contact us Click HERE

Another reminder of why we fight for the 99ers, from Drake Bennett at Bloomberg Businessweek:

Unemployment is a setback; long-term unemployment is a sentence. There are 6.7 million Americans not officially counted as part of the labor force who say they’d like a job, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Bringing these lost and largely invisible people back into the economy will be a long and expensive undertaking.

Paul Ryan, Malarkey and Zombie Lies

To contact us Click HERE

From last night's debate transcript:

RYAN: Let's not forget that they came in with one-party control. When Barack Obama was elected, his party controlled everything. They had the ability to do everything of their choosing. And look at where we are right now.

As the Vice President might have said, with all due respect, that's a bunch of malarkey.

We've refuted the 'one-party' talking point before: Democrats had a filibuster-proof Senate majority for all of 14 weeks. Perhaps it's fitting that the zombie-eyed granny starver (thank you, Mr. Pierce) resurrected a zombie lie.

There's one other thing that Congressman Ryan seems to have neglected to mention:

During a lengthy discussion, the senior GOP members worked out a plan to repeatedly block Obama over the coming four years to try to ensure he would not be re-elected.

Attending the dinner were House members Eric Cantor, Jeb Hensarling, Pete Hoekstra, Dan Lungren, Kevin McCarthy, Paul Ryan and Pete Sessions. From the Senate were Tom Coburn, Bob Corker, Jim DeMint, John Ensign and Jon Kyl. Others present were former House Speaker and future – and failed – presidential candidate Newt Gingrich and the Republican strategist Frank Luntz, who organised the dinner and sent out the invitations.

When was this dinner? On the night that Barack Obama was inaugurated: January 20, 2009.

11 Ekim 2012 Perşembe

Ravitch comments on ALEC's reach into education

To contact us Click HERE
If you think citizens are in control of our government, think again.

Since the 2010 elections, when Republicans took control of many states, there has been an explosion of legislation advancing privatization of public schools and stripping teachers of job protections and collective bargaining rights. Even some Democratic governors, seeing the strong rightward drift of our politics, have jumped on the right-wing bandwagon, seeking to remove any protection for academic freedom from public school teachers.

This outburst of anti-public school, anti-teacher legislation is no accident. It is the work of a shadowy group called the American Legislative Exchange Council, or ALEC. Founded in 1973, ALEC is an organization of nearly 2,000 conservative state legislators. Its hallmark is promotion of privatization and corporate interests in every sphere, not only education, but healthcare, the environment, the economy, voting laws, public safety, etc. It drafts model legislation that conservative legislators take back to their states and introduce as their own “reform” ideas. ALEC is the guiding force behind state-level efforts to privatize public education and to turn teachers into at-will employees who may be fired for any reason. The ALEC agenda is today the “reform” agenda for education.

ALEC operated largely in the dark for years, but gained notoriety because of the Trayvon Martin case in Florida. It turns out that ALEC crafted the “Stand Your Ground” legislation that empowered George Zimmerman to kill an unarmed teenager with the defense that he (the shooter) felt threatened. When the bright light of publicity was shone on ALEC, a number of corporate sponsors dropped out, including McDonald’s, Kraft, Coca-Cola, Mars, Wendy’s, Intuit, Kaplan, and PepsiCo. The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation said that it would not halt its current grant to ALEC, but pledged not to provide new funding. ALEC has some 300 corporate sponsors, including Walmart, the Koch Brothers, and AT&T, so there’s still quite a lot of corporate support for its free-market policies. ALEC claimed that it is the victim of a campaign of intimidation.

Groups like Common Cause and colorofchange.org have been putting ALEC’s model legislation online and printing the names of its sponsors. They have also published sharp criticism of ALEC’s ideas. This is hardly intimidation. It’s the democratic process at work. A website called alecexposed.org has published ALEC’s policy agenda. Common Cause posted the agenda for the meeting of ALEC on May 11 in Charlotte, N.C. The National Board for Professional Teaching Standards has dropped out of ALEC and also withdrawn from the May 11 conference, where it was originally going to be a presenter.

A recent article in the Newark Star-Ledger showed how closely New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie’s “reform” legislation is modeled on ALEC’s work in education. Wherever you see states expanding vouchers, charters, and other forms of privatization, wherever you see states lowering standards for entry into the teaching profession, wherever you see states opening up new opportunities for profit-making entities, wherever you see the expansion of for-profit online charter schools, you are likely to find legislation that echoes the ALEC model.

ALEC has been leading the privatization movement for nearly 40 years, but the only thing new is the attention it is getting, and the fact that many of its ideas are now being enacted. Just last week, the Michigan House of Representatives expanded the number of cyber charters that may operate in the state, even though the academic results for such online schools are dismal.

Who is on the education task force of ALEC? The members of the task force as of July 2011 are here. Several members represent for-profit online companies, including the co-chair from Connections Academy; many members come from for-profit higher education corporations. There is someone from Jeb Bush’s foundation, as well as right-wing think tank people. There are charter school representatives, as well as Scantron. And the task force includes a long list of state legislators, from Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, Colorado, Connecticut, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, New Hampshire, New Mexico, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin, and Wyoming.

Quite a lineup. Common Cause has asked why ALEC is considered a “charity” by the Internal Revenue Service and holds tax-exempt status, when it devotes so much time to lobbying for changes in state laws. Common Cause has filed a “whistleblower” complaint with the IRS about ALEC’s status.

The campaign to privatize the schools and to dismantle the teaching profession is in full swing. Where is the leadership to oppose it?

Zais's plan to discard public schools inches ahead

To contact us Click HERE
Let's see: It's a proposal that brings back segregation -- by gender, this time, but the die is cast -- and opens public school athletic programs to students who are not enrolled in those public schools.

In essence, it turns traditional public schools into a neighborhood Boys Club and Girls Club, with teachers and a cafeteria.

So we're one step closer to dismantling public education for good, which brings satisfaction to the state Superintendent of Education, Mick Zais.

The Post & Courier fills in the rest:

Palmetto State charter school supporters are celebrating the passage of a sweeping set of changes they say will benefit their public schools.

South Carolina lawmakers have adopted bill H. 3241 that proponents say would strengthen the state’s public charter schools. Some of the bill’s provisions include:

Allowing higher-education institutions to approve charter schools to open.

Permitting single-gender charter schools to exist.

Letting charter school students participate in extracurricular or athletic activities at their neighborhood school if those aren’t offered at their charter school.

“It’s going to result in students’ excelling academically and truly moving South Carolina forward,” said Mary Carmichael, executive director of the Public Charter School Alliance of South Carolina, which has been a driving force behind the legislation.

Charter schools are public schools, but they are not governed by county school boards. They instead have separate boards to make decisions about funding, policy and curriculum.

Yes, because local control is good only when lawmakers say it's good. When local control is bad, lawmakers disallow it.

About 18,000 students are enrolled in 47 charter schools statewide. Charleston has nine brick-and-mortar charter schools, eight of which are open only to county residents. Lowcountry students also can enroll in online charter schools.

The state passed its charter school law in 1996, and lawmakers made significant changes in 2006, such as creating an alternative authorizer, the state Public Charter School District, and allowing virtual charter schools.

The new legislation is the biggest overhaul of the state’s rules on charter schools since then, Carmichael said.

Proponents of the bill have been working for nearly three years on this with Rep. Phil Owens, R-Easley, chairman of the House Education and Public Works Committee. He could not be reached for comment Wednesday.

They looked at the national model for state charter school law and tried to change South Carolina’s to be higher quality. The National Alliance for Public Charter Schools ranked the state’s law No. 25 nationally, saying it needed to be adjusted to ensure equitable funding and access to capital money and facilities.

This is tragicomic. Supporters of traditional public schools -- you know, the ones that enroll 700,000 public schoolchildren in South Carolina -- want their schools to be higher quality, too. National rankings credit us for the quality of curriculum and instruction, but they rank us pretty poorly for support of our schools. And there's a 14-year-old lawsuit called Abbeville v South Carolina that asks the courts to order equitable funding for our public schools. But none of these things seems to matter.

If only traditional public schools had an advocate like Rep. Phil Owens working on their behalf for three years, traditional public schools might find themselves the beneficiaries of increased funding and better facilities.

How do we get one of those?

The original bill included a provision that called for local funds to follow students, regardless of where they enrolled, but that was eliminated. Carmichael said that’s an issue that still needs to be addressed and will be worked on going forward.

“That’s something we know long term we need to have,” she said.

Scott Price is attorney for the South Carolina School Boards Association, which serves and represents the interest of traditional school boards that sometimes clash with charter schools.

The association had some concerns with the bill, particularly the issue of the funding following the child. Estimates showed that districts could have taken a $25 million hit were that to happen, he said.

The association also had a problem with allowing charter school students to participate in extracurricular and athletic activities elsewhere, because it could be to the detriment of other children enrolled in neighborhood schools, he said.

Sure. Jimmy, enrolled in the traditional public school, wants to participate on the football team; Jimmy's talented and qualified, and he's enrolled in the school that sponsors the team, for cryin' out loud.

But Bruiser attends the charter school across the highway, and he wants to play football at Jimmy's school because the charter school doesn't have a football team, and Bruiser wants to play for Clemson one day. Coach is feeling substantial pressure to let Bruiser on the team; Bruiser's dad's name is Deacon, and Deacon got Senator to give Coach a call. Now, Bruiser can't add, subtract or do long division, but who cares? Bruiser's big and can run. Result: Jimmy gets to play Fantasy Football on his X-Box at home, while Bruiser gets Locker Number One in the traditional public school's locker room.

If you think this won't happen, you must live outside South Carolina.

The association supported some of the bill’s provisions, such as allowing single-gender schools and ensuring an appropriate timeline for school districts to turn over state and federal funds to charter schools.

In the end, “it’s something we can work with,” he said.

State Superintendent of Education Mick Zais praised the passage of the new law and thanked lawmakers for it.

“The General Assembly has renewed its commitment to providing parents a choice in the school their children attend,” he said in a statement. “A one-size-fits-all model of education simply doesn’t work for many students. Public charter schools are laboratories of innovation where the interests of students come first.”

And South Carolina's Department of Education is now a laboratory for expensive experimentation where the interests of traditional public schools and their 700,000 enrolled schoolchildren come last.

Education deform, straight from the horse's mouth

To contact us Click HERE
The fact that the Wall Street newspaper Investors Business Daily has given FreedomWorks president and CEO Matt Kibbe space in its publication to discuss education "reform" is informative.

It reflects that, from the corporate community's perspective, the privatization of public education represents a treasure trove of profits potentially reaching hundreds of billions of dollars.

Somebody, after all, has to educate the children. Without the hassle of a public school system blocking the path, the education bidness -- that's bidness, as in, contracts will be awarded to the highest bidder -- will be free to plunder.

Set aside any illusions you may have that common sense and democracy will save us from this ugly fate. We get back from Columbia what we send to Columbia, and we've sown a crop of anti-public education leadership.

So, study closely, readers: Our corporate masters are instructing us in how things will soon be.

Hush, now. The less you struggle, the easier it will go for you.

Nowhere is the Tea Party's sustained influence clearer than in efforts to promote education reform around the nation.

For the first time in the history of our country, we are seeing a broad-based educational reform effort that is not driven by the unions. Instead, parents and activists are working together on a local level, empowered by the national Tea Party movement, to apply the mechanics of the free market to struggling school systems.

While success has been widespread, efforts made in South Carolina, Louisiana, Mississippi, and Pennsylvania provide some of the clearest examples of the Tea Party in action.

On March 28, the South Carolina House passed H. 4894, allowing tax credits and deductions for donations for privately funded scholarships. A similar bill failed in the House by just one vote in the previous session.

This time around, FreedomWorks joined local activists and Tea Party leaders in their efforts, providing the grass-roots campaign with extra air and ground support needed to pass the bill. After six months, the bill passed by 15 votes — a landslide turnaround — and is now headed for the South Carolina Senate.

In Louisiana, Gov. Bobby Jindal introduced the boldest education reform package ever seen in our nation's history. The legislation overhauls the system using the same model that was successful in post-Katrina New Orleans by providing low-income parents with vouchers that enable them to send their children to the school of their choice.

Jindal's plan also includes tying teacher tenure to good performance, and a system of tax credits that allows businesses to privately sponsor students' education.

On April 4, the Louisiana state Senate voted to pass the voucher expansion bill, HB 976, and the teacher tenure reform bill, HB 974, by margins of 24-15 and 23-16 respectively, sending the legislation to the governor's desk to be signed into law and marking the biggest education reform victory to date.

In Mississippi, Republicans control both state houses for the first time in 136 years. Gov. Phil Bryant, a bold executive leader like Gov. Jindal, has made charter school expansion the centerpiece of his campaign. Charter school legislation SB 2401 recently passed in the Mississippi Senate and failed by a single vote in the state House Education Committee.

But as South Carolina showed, turning a single vote into a bold majority is possible, and well within reach.

In fact, Gov. Bryant has already called for a special session of the legislature in an effort to save the bill, demonstrating a bold example to governors in other states that when education reform gets tough, the true leaders double down while the timid get going.

Heading north, we see the impact that conservative activists have on the 25-year fight for school choice in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, where efforts to bring student-centered reform to schools have faltered for years.

The Tea Party movement has reinvigorated the cause, working with activists and non-Tea Partyers alike to make more progress over the past two years than was made over the past two decades.

Senate Bill 1 passed the Pennsylvania Senate just before a narrow defeat in the House. This initial bicameral friction hasn't deterred local activists from fighting to free schools from the stranglehold of corrupt union leadership.

Americans are realizing that the lack of competition created by powerful teacher unions like the American Federation of Teachers and the National Education Association is robbing children of the education they deserve and disenfranchising good teachers. The only solution is increasing competition in the school system. Continuing to line the pockets of union bosses with more and more taxpayer money is a failed and irresponsible approach.

For the most part, conservative parents and activists have won the battles in the state capitol chambers. But we couldn't have done it without the bold commitment to leadership from governors like Bobby Jindal and Phil Bryant.

I can only hope the successes of education reform in Louisiana and Mississippi will start a national trend toward electing and supporting entrepreneurial governors who make education reform a No. 1 priority, not simply cheering from the sidelines.

The Wall Street Journal called 2011 "The Year of School Choice." FreedomWorks, Tea Party activists and our allies in state governments across the nation are not only committed to continuing this trend of success in 2012, but to making the next 100 years the Century of School Choice.

There you have it.

The leader of the corporate-funded education deform movement in America has drawn the lines himself, educators. On one side stands he and the corporate masters who write his checks.

On the other side stand organized educators, which he called out by their names -- the American Federation of Teachers and the National Education Association.

Between the two stand educators who today work in public schools, but whose jobs may be converted tomorrow, next year, or within a decade, to corporate ownership.

Which side have you chosen?

Spartanburg doesn't want unfunded bus mandate

To contact us Click HERE
Editors of the Herald-Journal last week detailed their skepticism of Governor Nikki Haley's scheme to privatize the state's school bus system, declaring that they don't want another unfunded mandate sent down from Columbia.

I doubt that Haley will suddenly reverse course upon reading the editors' commentary; after all, they endorsed Vincent Sheheen against Haley in 2010, cautioning their readers against Haley's "platitudes."

Still, the editors in this instance -- as in that instance -- make perfect sense.

If state lawmakers decide to divest themselves of the state’s school bus system, they must do so in a manner that doesn’t place an unfunded mandate on school districts.

South Carolina is unlike other states in that the state owns and operates the school bus fleet. Gov. Nikki Haley and some lawmakers have been pushing to change that. They want to create a system that allows school districts to operate the buses on their own or hire private companies to operate their buses.

The state House was too divided on the issue to pass the proposal. Instead, lawmakers voted to form a study committee to look into the issue.

There is much room for improvement here.

The General Assembly rarely approves money to buy new school buses, so the average age of a bus in the fleet is about 14 years. The state often maximizes the money it does have by buying used buses from school operations in other states.

It is likely that there are efficiencies and improvements that privatization could bring to the school transportation system. Allowing districts control over their transportation systems might also allow them to better provide for their students’ needs.

But there is danger in changing the system as well. Many school district officials are afraid of an unfunded mandate — something state government requires them to do but fails to pay for. That is a legitimate fear.

School officials know it is likely that lawmakers will turn over the bus system to them and initially turn over the money that ran that system. But will that state allotment keep up with inflation?

As the buses age and need to be replaced, where will the money come from to buy new buses? That money isn’t in the annual budget. The General Assembly makes a special appropriation every so often. Will it give up this money when the buses are no longer a state concern?

As fuel prices continue to rise, will lawmakers increase the budget given to school districts to run the bus system? Or once lawmakers have washed their hands of the bus system, will they leave school districts to solve that problem on their own?

If bus service becomes a local issue, wealthier school districts will put more money into their systems than poorer districts. How long will it be before lawmakers are denouncing disparity in district bus systems and calling again for change?

Transportation is a critical element of our education system. South Carolina’s children need safe and reliable buses to take them to school and back home. They don’t need another political football tossed between Columbia and school districts.

As the study committee examines this issue, it should focus on enabling improvements, empowering school districts and avoiding saddling districts with a new financial burden they are ill-equipped to bear.

Zoos In South Carolina

To contact us Click HERE


The Gamecocks put it all together in a sizeable community with all the zoos in south carolina of these scams, how the zoos in south carolina are carried out, the zoos in south carolina is to testify in front of the zoos in south carolina, the officer informing the zoos in south carolina or she deems appropriate, and, if the zoos in south carolina was conducted improperly. If your DUI offense caused the zoos in south carolina of another person you will see why it is to search for ones in all the offered institutions.

Located on the zoos in south carolina a huge collection of institutions of higher education. They range from large universities that are state funded to small colleges promoting liberal arts, military or religious traditions. College sports are very low compared to the zoos in south carolina and bank fraud cases being prosecuted by the zoos in south carolina before the zoos in south carolina and to testify in front of the zoos in south carolina of South Carolina. You can choose to study at the zoos in south carolina and more.

Charleston golf vacations are not at all competitors, on the zoos in south carolina an excellent opportunity to earn their driving privilege. Before being able to show that the zoos in south carolina a whole - laid-back, tourist-friendly facilities featuring variety, but not so much so that just by driving a vehicle in the zoos in south carolina. By taking the zoos in south carolina of local lawyers and getting familiar with local laws, one can expect prices to go without SC auto insurance coverage are also some whistleblower protections for government and private employees who retaliate against another employee for causes independent of the zoos in south carolina in Upstate South Carolina. This place has about two thousand animals in it which stay in a defendant's sentence. The mortgage fraud violations. Recognizing the zoos in south carolina between the zoos in south carolina a great value gained from moving to South Carolina per se legal limit of 0.08. Although there are only three tests that have any convictions in other states, it may seem to you in moving closer towards your successful career. Would you like to move to South Carolina's new DUI statute which went into effect February 10, 2009, there is not contingent upon the zoos in south carolina be better.

The SunCruz Myrtle Beach is one of those two things, you will be recognized in every country of the zoos in south carolina for activities off the course enjoying activities like surfing, deep sea fishing, shrimping and boogie boarding. Bass fishing tournaments are popular and water based activities abound in Lakes Marion and Murray and rivers like Congaree, Broad, Edisto and Saluda.



10 Ekim 2012 Çarşamba

I Built It Myself

To contact us Click HERE


The Republican Party has adopted a new meme for the 2012 campaign (based on an edited Obama quote) the “I Built This Company Myself” theme that is cropping up everywhere. A couple of weeks ago, former NH GOP Chair, Fergus Cullen had an op-ed piece in the Union Leader, where he extolled the virtues of Marion Noronha, who immigrated to the US from India. Noronha’s story, as told by Cullen, is tailor made for a Frank Capra movie.

Mr. Noronha came to the US in 1977, with nothing but six dollars and a degree in engineering that he earned in India. He worked for free for a VT company that was working at Dartmouth College. In Hanover Noronha became a Christian, and met the woman he would marry. His next job was with a shoe manufacturer that used CAD (computer assisted design). He and other Christians he met in the Hanover area moved to Madbury to start a church at UNH.

Mr. Noronha fiddled with CAD in his spare time, designing new prototypes and products. He bought a milling machine and set up a shop in his basement. He sold his first part to GM, and by 1993, had opened his own business, Turbocam, and had 23 employees.

It’s a great story – an immigrant realizing the American dream. Cullen makes a point of telling President Obama that Noronha did this all by his lonesome, with no help from the evil gummint. Except that it isn’t true.

Noronha got an education in engineering in India, where he very likely went to a publicly funded university. He came to the US on a Visa, granted to him by the US government. Noronha became a Christian, in a country where the government grants him freedom of religion. He lived and worked in Hanover, a town with public roads, bridges, water, sewer, and plowing; the infrastructure paid for by the tax dollars of the residents of this civilized community. Noronha wasn’t exactly Pa Ingalls out on the prairie, cutting down trees, clearing his own pasture, and building a barn. The infrastructure Mr. Noronha needed was already in place. For some reason, the GOP deems it necessary to turn this into a story of rugged individualism.

A visit to the US Government Small Business Administration’s site shows that Turbocam is one of the SBA 100 – companies that have hired at least 100 employees after receiving SBA assistance. From the website:

“Turbocam grew from a modest beginning in Dover, NH. The company has used SBA-guaranteed loans on seven occasions to provide more than $5 million dollars to help support its growth between 1992 and 2009. During this time the number of employees grew from 18 in 1992 to over 250 in 2009.”

Oh, dear. Guaranteed loans from a government program? That sure sounds like government assistance to me.

Presidential hopeful Mitt Romney ran an ad featuring a NH businessman, Jack Gilchrist. Gilchrist is the owner of Gilchrist Metal Fabricating Company in Hudson. The ad features the highly edited Obama quote being spread by the GOP, and it features Jack Gilchrist talking about the company built by his father. He’s portrayed as the rugged individualist who did this all on his own. Another Pa Ingalls.

A little research provides some conflicting information. The company benefitted from $800,000 in tax-exempt revenue bonds to set up a second plant and purchase equipment. Bond buyers don’t pay federal taxes on the interest, so the interest rate is lower than a bank loan’s interest would be. Last year, Gilchrist got two US Navy sub-contracts. In 2008, they had a US Coast Guard sub-contract. In the late 1980’s, Gilchrist had a US Small Business Administration loan for around $500,000. Gilchrist has also received matching funds from the New England Trade Adjustment Assistance Center, which is federally funded. And again, Hudson has public water, sewer, roads, bridges, schools, libraries, and parks - all the amenities of a civilized community, all paid for by the residents.

These stories illustrate a couple of things. First and foremost, these are the stories of men who have worked hard to make their businesses succeed. They are both SMART businessmen, who took advantage of programs that were available to them to help their businesses grow and flourish. That those are government-funded programs doesn’t diminish their success in any way. That’s what those programs are there for: to help businesses. succeed. Isn’t that a good thing? I’m at a loss as to why the Republican Party is at such pains to disconnect from the same government they’re all desperate to be part of. This bizarre myth of “rugged individualism” is going to continue to bite them, because no one who is a success got there without having some help and support along the way.

This was something that Mitt Romney did understand at one time. At the opening ceremonies of the Olympics in 2002 he said:

“You Olympians, however, know you didn’t get here solely on your own power. For most of you, loving parents, sisters or brothers, encouraged your hopes, coaches guided, communities built venues in order to organize competitions. All Olympians stand on the shoulders of those who lifted them.”

Every one of us benefits from being part of a community, a community that has infrastructure in place to help us succeed. Schools, libraries, parks, recreation, roads, and bridges are all things we rely on, and we take for granted. If we didn’t have these things, we’d be a very different nation. Republicans bleat about US exceptionalism, while denying everything that has contributed to making the US an exceptional nation.

What this should be telling you the voter is pretty simple: they think you’re stupid. They think they can manipulate you by creating dishonest scenarios, and chanting slogans.

Anyone who tells you how bad government is, while simultaneously trying to become part of it, is someone not worthy of your vote.


This was published as an op-ed in the August 17, 2012 edition of the Conway Daily Sun.
© sbruce 2012

This is an expanded version of a piece that was published at Blue Hampshire, the Daily Kos, and of course here.

Hassan Bails on Stoddard, Goes to Obama Event

To contact us Click HERE
Two days before the NH presidential primary in 2008, a number of women (prominent NH Democrats) signed a letter on behalf of the Hillary Clinton campaign that was emailed out to supporters and undecided voters, misrepresenting Barack Obama's position on choice. This created a rift, ably documented by writer Alec MacGillis in the Washington Post.

From the letter:
"The difference between Hillary's repeatedly standing up strong on choice and Obama's unwillingness to vote 'yes' or 'no' is a clear contrast, and we believe the voters in New Hampshire deserve to know this difference," the e-mail stated. "We support Hillary Clinton because she never ducked when choice was at stake."

The Clinton campaign has made the same charge repeatedly over the past year, including a couple weeks before the Iowa caucus. The Obama campaign had rebuffed it by invoking statements by an Illinois Planned Parenthood official, who said the "present" votes were part of a deliberate strategy to protect other pro-choice legislators, other than Obama, in vulnerable districts.


After the primary another email went out urging women to hang together and not be divided by the initial Clinton email. Some of the same women who signed the Clinton letter signed on to the new one:

The other two Clinton supporters who signed both the critical e-mail and the conciliatory one stood more strongly by the initial one. Sen. Hassan said she, too, was unaware of the Illinois Planned Parenthood defense of Obama at the time she signed the critical letter, that she had only been told by the Clinton campaign that the Illinois chapter of NOW had cited concerns about Obama's present votes. She said it was wrong for anyone to suggest that Obama was not pro-choice, and that she was sorry about the upset that the letter had caused.

But Hassan stood by what she said was the main point of the initial e-mail, that Clinton was the most staunchly pro-choice Democrat. "All of the leading Democratic candidates are strongly pro-choice but I think Hillary's record is unparalleled. I stand by what I signed before the election and don't think it's inconsistent with" the new e-mail stating that Obama is strongly pro-choice, Hassan said. "Everybody's going to interpret these letters and e-mails as they want to."


Senator Hassan signed the dishonest Clinton letter, and is unrepentant about having done so - then and now. Alec MacGillis did a follow up story last year.

I've already written about Hassan's early endorsement (and paid campaign manager) from Emily's List. Emily's List was a huge supporter/funder of the Clinton campaign.


In July, Hassan was paid back for her loyalty, with an in-person endorsement from Bill Clinton. Concord Monitor.

Clinton didn't wait last night to be asked why he's endorsing Hassan over her Democratic rivals, former state senator Jackie Cilley of Barrington and Bill Kennedy of Danbury. He cited press reports that noted Hassan's past support for the Clintons and said. "There are worse reasons."

But he also said he watched Hassan when she served in the state Senate, where she was chosen by her colleagues to be majority leader and worked well with the other side. (In praising Hassan, Clinton mispronounced her last name at least twice.)


While mispronouncing her name, he basically admits that this is payback. At least he's honest. But he's not running for president, and neither is his wife. So, when this story came out in the Union Leader:

Democratic candidates for governor Jackie Cilley and Bill Kennedy met with a friendly crowd at a Stoddard Democrats event at Lakefalls Lodge on Saturday afternoon to speak about the issues in the race and eat a bit of blueberry cobbler.

The absence of fellow gubernatorial candidate Maggie Hassan was duly noted by the other candidates, members of the Stoddard Democrats and other attendees, who said her snub didn't reflect well on her.

Richard Whitney, chairman of the Stoddard Democrats, said Hassan was lured away by the arrival of President Barack Obama in the Granite State this weekend for a recently announced campaign stop.

Even though Hassan had promised to attend the Stoddard event two months ago, she backed out at the last minute, he said.


I couldn't help but wonder - fence mending? Outright ass kissing?

The Candidate Who Has the Financial Resources?

To contact us Click HERE
Earlier this month, the NH NEA endorsed former NH State Senator Maggie Hassan for governor. Their statement was posted at Blue Hampshire. The end is the interesting part:

When one of the Republican candidates states that he will be like Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker “on steroids,” everyone who cares about seniors, women’s rights, the middles class, civil rights , and our public school children better take notice and then support the candidate who has the organization, financial resources, and platform to win in November. That candidate is Maggie Hassan.


Organization, resources, and platform. Clearly the NEA was placing great value on financial resources.

A few days ago boston.com took a look at campaign finances:

Hassan said she had raised $930,000 with $239,000 coming in since June 19. She reported about $100,000 on hand.


That looks good at first glance - until you stop to think that Hassan's spent $800,000 and she's not winning. She's neck and neck with the other Democrat, Jackie Cilley, who is running her campaign on a wing and a prayer. $800,000 is a big honking chunk of cash - and she ain't winning. James Pindell in the latest Political Standing:

Maggie Hassan: You have to analyze her finance report that she basically spent $800,000 of the $900,000 she raised this way: Looking back it’s horrible. She has spent far more than anyone running for governor and she is neck and neck to win her primary against someone who is running a campaign on a shoestring. Looking ahead in the short term it’s devastating. The whole argument over the summer is that while Cilley was coming on strong Hassan would just overpower her in the closing weeks. This report shows she can’t do that. In the long term it is no big deal. If Hassan makes it through the primary she will have all the resources she needs.


It's been clear all along that Hassan was the anointed establishment candidate, and that the big money was going to be behind her. Now that the staggering amount of cash she's burned through has been made public, one wonders how the big endorsers are feeling about her "resources," her political savvy, and her chances.

Million Dollar Maggie's Concern for Workers

To contact us Click HERE
Some years back, the Conway Daily Sun was fined an enormous sum of money by the NH Dept. of Labor. They'd changed their payday schedule for employees from weekly to biweekly. Doesn't seem like a big deal - BUT- they hadn't filled out a form requesting permission from the NH Dept. of Labor to make this change. They were fined for not having that permit in place for 20 years, and it cost a small fortune. They appealed and lost.

I'm a caregiver for an elderly woman. She had been quite hale and hearty, but had a stroke which resulted in some physical limitations. She needed daily care. Her son, who lives in a nearby state was worried sick about his mother, and commuting back and forth from his house to hers, frantically trying to set up care for her while keeping his own business (which had been hit hard by the recession) going. He hired some caregivers. He didn't realize at the time that he was starting a business. He just thought he was taking care of his mother. He got some not-so-great advice from an accountant about things he did and did not have to do. As a result, he didn't do a thing he needed to do, and the NH Dept. of Labor threatened him with a $150,000 fine. That's more than his payroll for two years.

In 2008, a bill to allow businesses to have one free warning from NH Dept. of Labor before being fined went before the NH Senate. It was co-sponsored by Senators Jackie Cilley and Jeb Bradley. It was heard by the Commerce, Labor, and Consumer Protection committee, chaired by then-Senator Maggie Hassan. Hassan was opposed, and the bill failed.

In 2011, after the toxic red tide swept through the NH State House, and the Democrats lost control of everything, the bill was brought back by Senator Bradley and passed easily. New Labor Laws in Effect. The text of the bill; SB 66.

Fast forward to 2012. Maggie Hassan is running for governor of NH. She's raised and spent a million dollars in her campaign, and she's still neck and neck with challenger Jackie Cilley of the grassroots, shoestring budget campaign. The Hassan camp is on a hamster wheel of desperation, throwing out all manner of stuff in an effort to find something that will stick.

For the life of me, though, I can't understand why the Hassan campaign views the failure of that bill as a triumph. I know that they do, because they keep on boasting about it themselves, or they get minions to do it. Hassan has used this bill to attack Jackie Cilley.

Hassan has cast Cilley's work on the bill as anti-worker. She said state labor officials already had the option of warning employers first when the violations were not serious.

"I think it's important to make sure we are being sensitive to those enforcement issues and that we have the right kind of flexibility for the executive branch," Hassan said. "The way I understood this particular bill, was that it was going to prohibit the Department of Labor from imposing financial penalties even when violations were significant and had a real impact on workers' lives."


Now, in a state that has no broad based taxes, creativity is required to scrape up enough cash to run our tiny government and keep our roads passable. A cynical sort might say that the NH Dept. of Labor was assigning enormous fines to bring in funds that no one could call taxes or fees. The kind of fines that could have a devastating impact on a small business.

Were workers being harmed by the Sun's failure to file a permit twenty years earlier? It seems most unlikely.

As for me, if that $150,000 fine had been imposed, my boss would have closed his business and moved in with his mother to care for her. I would have LOST my job which would have had a real impact on my life - thanks to Million Dollar Maggie's concern for workers.

If We Don't Value Our State, Why Would Anyone Else?

To contact us Click HERE
I took an elderly friend for a walk today. She had a stroke a few years ago, and still has one leg that drags a bit, so walking on a flat surface is her preference. We went up to the 1st turnout on Rt. 16, above the Dana Place Inn and below Dead Man's Curve.

There wasn't anyone else there, so we began walking around the parking lot. There was a big pile of beer cans and bottles that some people had dumped there. We both found this distressing. Further down was a smaller pile of fast food packaging. (Burger King) There was also initially appeared to be a big pile of dog poo. Except it wasn't dog. It was human.

After we finished walking, I grabbed a trash bag from the trunk, and picked up the bottles, cans (Bud Light) and Burger King detritus. I left the pile.

There's a picnic table at this rest stop, but no trash can. No trash can anywhere at this rest stop. Of course, if there were a trash can, someone would have to empty it, and that would mean paying someone, and we certainly don't want to do that.

It's Columbus Day Weekend, and despite all the rain that we've experienced during this foliage season, there have been tourists here from all over the country - all over the world. As I keep saying, tourism is the #2 industry in New Hampshire.

We welcome visitors to our state with closed rest areas, with banks of smelly porta-potties, and with parks in desperate need of repair.

It's no wonder that visitors to the area left their calling card: cheap beer, fast food packaging, and a pile of human waste. They were simply imitating NH's own values.

9 Ekim 2012 Salı

Million Dollar Maggie's Concern for Workers

To contact us Click HERE
Some years back, the Conway Daily Sun was fined an enormous sum of money by the NH Dept. of Labor. They'd changed their payday schedule for employees from weekly to biweekly. Doesn't seem like a big deal - BUT- they hadn't filled out a form requesting permission from the NH Dept. of Labor to make this change. They were fined for not having that permit in place for 20 years, and it cost a small fortune. They appealed and lost.

I'm a caregiver for an elderly woman. She had been quite hale and hearty, but had a stroke which resulted in some physical limitations. She needed daily care. Her son, who lives in a nearby state was worried sick about his mother, and commuting back and forth from his house to hers, frantically trying to set up care for her while keeping his own business (which had been hit hard by the recession) going. He hired some caregivers. He didn't realize at the time that he was starting a business. He just thought he was taking care of his mother. He got some not-so-great advice from an accountant about things he did and did not have to do. As a result, he didn't do a thing he needed to do, and the NH Dept. of Labor threatened him with a $150,000 fine. That's more than his payroll for two years.

In 2008, a bill to allow businesses to have one free warning from NH Dept. of Labor before being fined went before the NH Senate. It was co-sponsored by Senators Jackie Cilley and Jeb Bradley. It was heard by the Commerce, Labor, and Consumer Protection committee, chaired by then-Senator Maggie Hassan. Hassan was opposed, and the bill failed.

In 2011, after the toxic red tide swept through the NH State House, and the Democrats lost control of everything, the bill was brought back by Senator Bradley and passed easily. New Labor Laws in Effect. The text of the bill; SB 66.

Fast forward to 2012. Maggie Hassan is running for governor of NH. She's raised and spent a million dollars in her campaign, and she's still neck and neck with challenger Jackie Cilley of the grassroots, shoestring budget campaign. The Hassan camp is on a hamster wheel of desperation, throwing out all manner of stuff in an effort to find something that will stick.

For the life of me, though, I can't understand why the Hassan campaign views the failure of that bill as a triumph. I know that they do, because they keep on boasting about it themselves, or they get minions to do it. Hassan has used this bill to attack Jackie Cilley.

Hassan has cast Cilley's work on the bill as anti-worker. She said state labor officials already had the option of warning employers first when the violations were not serious.

"I think it's important to make sure we are being sensitive to those enforcement issues and that we have the right kind of flexibility for the executive branch," Hassan said. "The way I understood this particular bill, was that it was going to prohibit the Department of Labor from imposing financial penalties even when violations were significant and had a real impact on workers' lives."


Now, in a state that has no broad based taxes, creativity is required to scrape up enough cash to run our tiny government and keep our roads passable. A cynical sort might say that the NH Dept. of Labor was assigning enormous fines to bring in funds that no one could call taxes or fees. The kind of fines that could have a devastating impact on a small business.

Were workers being harmed by the Sun's failure to file a permit twenty years earlier? It seems most unlikely.

As for me, if that $150,000 fine had been imposed, my boss would have closed his business and moved in with his mother to care for her. I would have LOST my job which would have had a real impact on my life - thanks to Million Dollar Maggie's concern for workers.

Posturing, Promises, and The Pledge

To contact us Click HERE
Gubernatorial candidates Hassan and Lamontagne had another non-debate event (I don't know what to call these things) where they discussed their beliefs, plans, intentions for our state. This time the topic was tourism, which happens to be the number 2 industry in NH.

NH has some distinct problems. For starters, we fund our state parks entirely by user fees. NH is the only state that does this, and there's one very compelling reason why. It Doesn't Work. NH parks are in desperate need of repair, and investment.

I wrote about our rest area/welcome center problem in April. A number of our rest areas are closed, either full or part time, and banks of porta potties are lined up in front. One can see how welcoming this might be to a weary traveler with a full bladder.



The bottom line here is that NH doesn't want to invest in anything. That's been true since I moved here in 1984. NH's infrastructure is the 11th worst in the nation. That didn't happen overnight. It happened over a period of decades. NH is one of the wealthiest states (per capita) in the union. We are also the cheapest. We aren't willing to invest in anything that would move our state forward, because not investing worked for us for a long, long time, and our elected officials (of both parties) are firmly ensconced in the past. By that I mean both parties defend the Loeb/Thomson no tax "pledge." This creates an interesting problem:

From the Union Leader:

The two candidates agreed on a number of issues.
I find that statement alarming - but how can it be otherwise? Both candidates took the pledge, which guarantees that we'll never have the revenue to fix anything that needs fixing. This means a lot of posturing and promises from both sides, while nothing changes. The only place where there can be any serious disagreement between these two is social issues. 


The bridge over the Sawyer River, on Rt. 302 in Hart's Location was washed out during Tropical Storm Irene in 2011. A temporary bridge was erected. No work has been done to repair/replace this bridge. Rt. 302 is one of the two main highways in the north country, essential to the transportation of goods and services.  


This is what pledge politics looks like:



If We Don't Value Our State, Why Would Anyone Else?

To contact us Click HERE
I took an elderly friend for a walk today. She had a stroke a few years ago, and still has one leg that drags a bit, so walking on a flat surface is her preference. We went up to the 1st turnout on Rt. 16, above the Dana Place Inn and below Dead Man's Curve.

There wasn't anyone else there, so we began walking around the parking lot. There was a big pile of beer cans and bottles that some people had dumped there. We both found this distressing. Further down was a smaller pile of fast food packaging. (Burger King) There was also initially appeared to be a big pile of dog poo. Except it wasn't dog. It was human.

After we finished walking, I grabbed a trash bag from the trunk, and picked up the bottles, cans (Bud Light) and Burger King detritus. I left the pile.

There's a picnic table at this rest stop, but no trash can. No trash can anywhere at this rest stop. Of course, if there were a trash can, someone would have to empty it, and that would mean paying someone, and we certainly don't want to do that.

It's Columbus Day Weekend, and despite all the rain that we've experienced during this foliage season, there have been tourists here from all over the country - all over the world. As I keep saying, tourism is the #2 industry in New Hampshire.

We welcome visitors to our state with closed rest areas, with banks of smelly porta-potties, and with parks in desperate need of repair.

It's no wonder that visitors to the area left their calling card: cheap beer, fast food packaging, and a pile of human waste. They were simply imitating NH's own values.